MFVL vs. BCI
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. MFVL is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. Their -0.18 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
MFVL vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 20.53% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.02M | $56.04M | $40.48M | |
| $67.79K | $50.95K | $88.95K |
MFVL vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 8.29% | 1.22% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 20.53% | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and BCI is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCI
MFVL vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFVL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -32.69% | +25.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -9.15% | +8.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -11.96% | +9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 17.65% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 16.87% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 15.68% | -1.85% |
MFVL vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.68% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and BCI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
MFVL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.26% for BCI.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer