PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUS vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.12% return.


MFUS

1D
0.19%
1M
4.47%
YTD
16.59%
6M
16.69%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.47%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.90%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.59%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%13.39%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and BBUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.89

The correlation between MFUS and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFUS vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFUS
BBUS

Technology

21.8%
37.1%

Healthcare

13.5%
8.1%

Industrials

12.6%
7.2%

Financial Services

12.6%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.3%
4.5%

Energy

7.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

5.3%
10.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Utilities

1.7%
2.6%

Technology

MFUS
21.8%
BBUS
37.1%

Healthcare

MFUS
13.5%
BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

MFUS
12.6%
BBUS
7.2%

Financial Services

MFUS
12.6%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MFUS
10.6%
BBUS
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

MFUS
10.3%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

MFUS
7.0%
BBUS
3.2%

Communication Services

MFUS
5.3%
BBUS
10.8%

Basic Materials

MFUS
2.8%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

MFUS
1.8%
BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

MFUS
1.7%
BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUS vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFUSBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

3.06

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

14.04

+4.48

MFUS vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFUSBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.37

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.80

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUSBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-35.35%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-9.21%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-19.01%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-25.46%

+7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-5.45%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.00%

-0.45%

Volatility

MFUS vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFUSBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.84%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

8.97%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

11.87%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

17.03%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

19.59%

-2.24%

MFUS vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUS vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.35%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUS and BBUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to BBUS (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 12.86% for MFUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.02% for BBUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUS and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer