MFUS vs. BBUS
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.86%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
MFUS vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.12% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.59% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 13.39% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and BBUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MFUS and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFUS vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
BBUS
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MFUS
BBUS
Healthcare
MFUS
BBUS
Industrials
MFUS
BBUS
Financial Services
MFUS
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
BBUS
Energy
MFUS
BBUS
Communication Services
MFUS
BBUS
Basic Materials
MFUS
BBUS
Real Estate
MFUS
BBUS
Utilities
MFUS
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
BBUS
MFUS vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 3.06 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 14.04 | +4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.37 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.84 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -35.35% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -9.21% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -19.01% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -25.46% | +7.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -5.45% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 2.00% | -0.45% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.84% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 8.97% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 11.87% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 17.03% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 19.59% | -2.24% |
MFUS vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUS and BBUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to BBUS (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 12.86% for MFUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.02% for BBUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer