MFMO vs. MMTM
MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds. MFMO is actively managed, while MMTM is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFMO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
MFMO vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 4.97% return.
MFMO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 21.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMTM
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
MFMO vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 23.78% | -1.80% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 4.97% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFMO and MMTM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFMO vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
MFMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MMTM
MFMO vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFMO | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFMO vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum MMTM drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFMO | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -33.85% | +21.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -5.25% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -4.19% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility
MFMO vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFMO | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.56% | 14.52% | +12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 18.26% | +8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 18.66% | +7.90% |
MFMO vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFMO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFMO vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.89% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFMO and MMTM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFMO.
MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFMO and 0.12% for MMTM.
Find the right allocation for MFMO and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer