MFMO vs. FTCS
MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. MFMO is actively managed, while FTCS is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFMO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
MFMO vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.01% return.
MFMO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 11.78%
- YTD
- 25.49%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
MFMO vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 25.49% | -1.90% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.01% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFMO and FTCS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFMO vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
MFMO
FTCS
MFMO vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFMO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.50 | +1.74 |
Drawdowns
MFMO vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFMO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -53.64% | +41.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.95% | +6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -6.92% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
MFMO vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFMO | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 9.82% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 13.13% | +11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 15.54% | +8.96% |
MFMO vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFMO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFMO vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFMO and FTCS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFMO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFMO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.
FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
MFMO is categorized as Momentum, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFMO and 0.53% for FTCS.
Find the right allocation for MFMO and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer