MFG vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) is a stock, while FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, MFG returned 15.72%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for FNDF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MFG vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, MFG has outperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 15.72%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.

MFG

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 11.39%
• YTD: 32.24%
• 6M: 31.34%
• 1Y: 78.46%
• 3Y*: 51.80%
• 5Y*: 30.84%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 21.60%
• 1Y: 41.60%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFG vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.	32.24%	54.60%	47.85%	26.14%	17.09%	2.40%	-15.06%	3.00%	-17.58%	3.21%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	19.66%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MFG and FNDF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.55

The correlation between MFG and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MFG vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFG

MFG Risk / Return Rank: 89
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFG vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFG	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.53	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.30	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	3.82	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	14.27	-6.02

MFG vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFG and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFG vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFG	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.57%	-40.14%	-40.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.78%	-10.60%	-14.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.33%	-13.89%	-14.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.33%	-25.56%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.87%	-40.14%	-9.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.06%	-1.94%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-7.63%	-53.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.31%	2.84%	+6.47%

Volatility

MFG vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) at 6.65%. This indicates that MFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFG	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.09%	6.65%	+3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.20%	13.64%	+10.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.69%	16.00%	+14.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.66%	16.35%	+13.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.49%	17.71%	+8.78%

Dividends

MFG vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FNDF's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.87%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.	0.96%	2.68%	3.20%	3.73%	4.34%	2.76%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	1.86%	3.77%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFG and FNDF in my portfolio?

MFG and FNDF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFG or FNDF?

MFG has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.