PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFG vs. INTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFG vs. INTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than INTR's -36.35% return.


MFG

1D
-4.63%
1M
3.86%
YTD
32.24%
6M
29.76%
1Y
81.09%
3Y*
52.82%
5Y*
31.99%
10Y*
15.22%

INTR

1D
-1.11%
1M
-13.47%
YTD
-36.35%
6M
-34.81%
1Y
-27.84%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFG vs. INTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
32.24%54.60%47.85%26.14%28.62%
INTR
Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares
-36.35%103.99%-23.68%134.60%-40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MFG and INTR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022

0.18

The correlation between MFG and INTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MFG:

$118.10B

INTR:

$2.38B

EPS

MFG:

¥101.00

INTR:

R$3.19

PE Ratio

MFG:

15.49

INTR:

8.59

PEG Ratio

MFG:

0.56

INTR:

0.01

PS Ratio

MFG:

2.24

INTR:

0.77

PB Ratio

MFG:

1.68

INTR:

1.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFG:

¥8.66T

INTR:

R$15.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFG:

¥4.12T

INTR:

R$6.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

MFG:

¥1.63T

INTR:

R$1.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFG vs. INTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFG
MFG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

INTR
INTR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
INTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
INTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFG vs. INTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFGINTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.93

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.59

+3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

-1.47

+10.20

MFG vs. INTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the INTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFG and INTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFG vs. INTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, which is greater than INTR's maximum drawdown of -68.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and INTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFGINTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.57%

-68.40%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.78%

-47.13%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.33%

-49.36%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-47.13%

+41.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-21.16%

-39.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.32%

18.90%

-9.58%

Volatility

MFG vs. INTR - Volatility Comparison

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR) at 9.13%. This indicates that MFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFGINTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

9.13%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

37.79%

-13.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.27%

49.37%

-18.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.77%

63.67%

-33.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.53%

63.67%

-37.14%

Dividends

MFG vs. INTR - Dividend Comparison

MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than INTR's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTR
Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares
2.12%0.94%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%2.68%3.20%3.73%4.34%2.76%2.71%0.00%0.00%1.86%3.77%3.10%

Financials

MFG vs. INTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
2.27T
4.22B
(MFG) Total Revenue
(INTR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MFG values in JPY, INTR values in BRL

MFG vs. INTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
51.7%
40.0%
Portfolio components
MFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.

INTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported a gross profit of 1.69B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

MFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

INTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported an operating income of 468.19M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

MFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

INTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported a net income of 387.40M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MFG and INTR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFG has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to INTR (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs INTR's -68.40%.

MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFG and INTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer