MFG vs. INTR
MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) and INTR (Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, MFG returned 50.11%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for INTR. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MFG vs. INTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 42.62% return, which is significantly higher than INTR's -33.13% return.
MFG
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- YTD
- 42.62%
- 1Y
- 81.27%
- 3Y*
- 50.11%
- 5Y*
- 34.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.24%
INTR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- -39.22%
- YTD
- -33.13%
- 1Y
- -12.62%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.61M | $23.33M | $36.89M | |
| $40.33M | $43.56M | $37.86M |
MFG vs. INTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 42.62% | 54.60% | 47.85% | 26.14% | 28.62% |
INTR Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares | -33.13% | 103.99% | -23.68% | 134.60% | -40.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFG and INTR is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MFG and INTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MFG:
$127.18B
INTR:
$2.47B
MFG:
¥101.44
INTR:
R$3.19
MFG:
16.21
INTR:
8.89
MFG:
0.59
INTR:
0.01
MFG:
2.34
INTR:
0.80
MFG:
1.76
INTR:
1.25
MFG:
¥8.66T
INTR:
R$15.78B
MFG:
¥4.12T
INTR:
R$6.47B
MFG:
¥1.63T
INTR:
R$1.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFG vs. INTR — Risk / Return Rank
MFG
INTR
MFG vs. INTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFG | INTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.99 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | -0.28 | +3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | -0.56 | +9.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFG vs. INTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, which is greater than INTR's maximum drawdown of -68.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and INTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFG | INTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.57% | -68.40% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.78% | -48.03% | +23.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.33% | -49.36% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -44.46% | +42.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.44% | -21.78% | -38.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.38% | 23.79% | -14.41% |
Volatility
MFG vs. INTR - Volatility Comparison
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR) have volatilities of 12.22% and 12.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFG | INTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.22% | 12.86% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.89% | 37.68% | -10.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.01% | 49.95% | -17.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 63.18% | -33.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 63.18% | -36.62% |
Dividends
MFG vs. INTR - Dividend Comparison
MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than INTR's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTR Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares | 2.02% | 0.94% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 0.89% | 2.68% | 3.20% | 3.73% | 4.34% | 2.76% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.86% | 3.77% | 3.10% |
Financials
MFG vs. INTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MFG vs. INTR - Profitability Comparison
MFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
INTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported a gross profit of 1.69B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
MFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
INTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported an operating income of 468.19M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
MFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
INTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported a net income of 387.40M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MFG and INTR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTR has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to MFG (12.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs INTR's -68.40%.
MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFG and INTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer