PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEM vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 37.41% return.


MFEM

1D
-1.11%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
21.07%
6M
20.93%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*

PIE

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.96%
YTD
37.41%
6M
33.49%
1Y
57.94%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
10.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
21.07%25.33%4.73%15.14%-19.50%10.77%11.33%15.26%-14.64%4.86%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
37.41%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and PIE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.81

The correlation between MFEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFEM
PIE

Technology

29.1%
51.1%

Financial Services

16.0%
14.1%

Basic Materials

13.8%
2.9%

Industrials

11.3%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
1.4%

Energy

7.5%
4.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
1.3%

Utilities

3.4%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

1.4%
4.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.5%

Technology

MFEM
29.1%
PIE
51.1%

Financial Services

MFEM
16.0%
PIE
14.1%

Basic Materials

MFEM
13.8%
PIE
2.9%

Industrials

MFEM
11.3%
PIE
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MFEM
9.1%
PIE
1.4%

Energy

MFEM
7.5%
PIE
4.6%

Communication Services

MFEM
4.5%
PIE
1.3%

Utilities

MFEM
3.4%
PIE
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

MFEM
3.1%
PIE
0.3%

Healthcare

MFEM
1.4%
PIE
4.3%

Real Estate

MFEM
1.0%
PIE
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM
MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFEMPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

5.90

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

18.23

-8.64

MFEM vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEM and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEMPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.32%

-72.98%

+29.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-9.87%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-28.69%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.84%

-40.32%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-5.99%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-26.01%

+14.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

3.19%

+0.59%

Volatility

MFEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) is 11.71%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that MFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEMPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.71%

13.05%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.67%

21.22%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.43%

24.27%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

20.84%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

21.57%

-1.94%

MFEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than PIE's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.30%2.77%5.89%4.01%7.01%29.96%1.70%2.37%1.18%0.21%0.00%0.00%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.76%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to MFEM (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEM dropped -43.32% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 5-year performance, MFEM leads with 7.23% vs 6.37% for PIE. On fees, MFEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFEM has been the lower-risk option at 11.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFEM has performed better with a 7.23% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

MFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.76% for PIE.

MFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. MFEM tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFEM and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEM and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer