PortfoliosLab logo
MFEM vs. PRF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and PRF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MFEM vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFEM:

0.13

PRF:

0.40

Sortino Ratio

MFEM:

0.34

PRF:

0.75

Omega Ratio

MFEM:

1.04

PRF:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

MFEM:

0.13

PRF:

0.48

Martin Ratio

MFEM:

0.36

PRF:

1.85

Ulcer Index

MFEM:

7.11%

PRF:

4.10%

Daily Std Dev

MFEM:

17.05%

PRF:

16.65%

Max Drawdown

MFEM:

-42.28%

PRF:

-60.35%

Current Drawdown

MFEM:

-7.06%

PRF:

-6.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than PRF's -1.08% return.


MFEM

YTD

3.00%

1M

8.53%

6M

-1.69%

1Y

2.22%

5Y*

9.85%

10Y*

N/A

PRF

YTD

-1.08%

1M

3.33%

6M

-4.64%

1Y

6.53%

5Y*

16.10%

10Y*

10.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFEM vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.39% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFEM vs. PRF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFEM is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFEM is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFEM is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFEM is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFEM is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFEM is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PRF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRF is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRF is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRF is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRF is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRF is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRF is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFEM vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MFEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEM and PRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MFEM vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than PRF's 1.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
5.82%5.89%4.01%7.01%29.96%1.70%2.37%2.99%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.88%1.78%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%1.73%

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.28%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and PRF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MFEM vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...