PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFA vs. REFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFA vs. REFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than REFI's -2.68% return.


MFA

1D
1.60%
1M
0.21%
YTD
6.33%
6M
5.69%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.15%

REFI

1D
3.06%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-4.63%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFA vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
6.33%6.07%2.63%30.66%-37.20%2.42%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-2.68%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MFA and REFI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.37

The correlation between MFA and REFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MFA:

$1.70

REFI:

$226.63

PE Ratio

MFA:

5.60

REFI:

0.05

PEG Ratio

MFA:

0.26

REFI:

0.00

PS Ratio

MFA:

2.19

REFI:

5.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFA:

$343.42M

REFI:

$44.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFA:

$413.35M

REFI:

$42.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

MFA:

$341.51M

REFI:

$8.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFA vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFA
MFA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFA vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFAREFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.97

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.46

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

-0.82

+3.97

MFA vs. REFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the REFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFA and REFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFA vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and REFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFAREFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.52%

-26.55%

-68.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-14.71%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-19.25%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.67%

-15.63%

-16.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-9.93%

-11.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

8.28%

-2.72%

Volatility

MFA vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) at 6.25%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFAREFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

6.25%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

16.18%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

23.78%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

24.32%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.77%

24.32%

+60.45%

Dividends

MFA vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison

MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.11%, less than REFI's 16.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
15.11%15.47%13.74%12.42%16.95%8.44%8.35%10.46%11.98%10.10%10.48%12.12%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.42%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MFA vs. REFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M2022202320242025202600
(MFA) Total Revenue
(REFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MFA and REFI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFA has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to REFI (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFA dropped -95.52% vs REFI's -26.55%.

MFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFA and REFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer