MFA vs. TWO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFA (MFA Financial, Inc.) and TWO (Two Harbors Investment Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, MFA returned 0.74%/yr vs -2.76%/yr for TWO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MFA vs. TWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than TWO's 25.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MFA has outperformed TWO with an annualized return of 0.74%, while TWO has yielded a comparatively lower -2.76% annualized return.

MFA

• 1D: -3.38%
• 1M: -9.94%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 13.88%
• 3Y*: 7.41%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 0.74%

TWO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 25.39%
• 6M: 29.08%
• 1Y: 34.40%
• 3Y*: 12.13%
• 5Y*: -3.67%
• 10Y*: -2.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFA vs. TWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFA MFA Financial, Inc.	2.09%	6.07%	2.63%	30.66%	-37.20%	27.71%	-40.87%	27.54%	-5.85%	14.30%
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp.	25.39%	2.52%	-2.73%	2.31%	-23.25%	0.03%	-52.19%	28.73%	-10.33%	26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MFA and TWO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2009	0.68

The correlation between MFA and TWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS MFA : $1.70 TWO : -$4.56
PS Ratio MFA : 2.10 TWO : 1.77
Total Revenue (TTM) MFA : $343.42M TWO : $546.33M
Gross Profit (TTM) MFA : $413.35M TWO : $524.61M
EBITDA (TTM) MFA : $341.51M TWO : -$7.58M

Return for Risk

MFA vs. TWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFA

MFA Risk / Return Rank: 59
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

TWO

TWO Risk / Return Rank: 65
TWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TWO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TWO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFA vs. TWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFA	TWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	0.85	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	1.50	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.22	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	0.94	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	2.70	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFA vs. TWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the TWO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFA and TWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFA	TWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	0.85	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	-0.11	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	-0.06	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.08	+0.03

Drawdowns

MFA vs. TWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than TWO's maximum drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and TWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFA	TWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.52%	-84.71%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-36.81%	+24.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.62%	-36.81%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.54%	-57.23%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.52%	-84.71%	-10.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.40%	-56.63%	+22.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.54%	-28.55%	+7.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	12.77%	-7.62%

Volatility

MFA vs. TWO - Volatility Comparison

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) at 3.09%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFA	TWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.17%	3.09%	+6.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.88%	37.09%	-20.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	40.91%	-18.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.73%	33.25%	-1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.78%	48.00%	+36.78%

Dividends

MFA vs. TWO - Dividend Comparison

MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.74%, more than TWO's 11.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFA MFA Financial, Inc.	15.74%	15.47%	13.74%	12.42%	16.95%	8.44%	8.35%	10.46%	11.98%	10.10%	10.48%	12.12%
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp.	11.41%	15.52%	15.22%	15.08%	12.94%	11.79%	7.85%	11.42%	14.64%	23.31%	10.67%	12.84%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFA and TWO in my portfolio?

MFA and TWO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFA or TWO?

MFA has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to TWO (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFA dropped -95.52% vs TWO's -84.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.