MFA vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MFA or JNJ.
Key characteristics
| MFA | JNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.25% | -4.04% |
| 1Y Return | 20.78% | -5.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.53% | -1.15% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.18% | 3.80% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.82% | 7.03% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.78 | -0.35 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.39% | 15.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.52% | -52.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -40.82% | -15.05% |
Fundamentals
| MFA | JNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $352.17B |
| EPS | $0.46 | $7.42 |
| PE Ratio | 23.33 | 19.70 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.25 | 0.89 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $234.05M | $85.65B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | -$138.54M | $63.95B |
Correlation
The correlation between MFA and JNJ is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MFA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's -4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MFA has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 0.82%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MFA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MFA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.79%, more than JNJ's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFA MFA Financial, Inc. | 12.79% | 12.42% | 16.95% | 8.44% | 8.35% | 10.46% | 11.98% | 10.10% | 10.48% | 12.12% | 10.01% | 23.23% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 3.19% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% | 2.64% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
MFA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MFA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 6.25%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MFA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities