MFA vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MFA or JNJ.
Correlation
The correlation between MFA and JNJ is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MFA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MFA:
0.33
JNJ:
0.32
MFA:
0.61
JNJ:
0.60
MFA:
1.08
JNJ:
1.07
MFA:
0.18
JNJ:
0.30
MFA:
0.88
JNJ:
0.73
MFA:
9.26%
JNJ:
7.24%
MFA:
24.56%
JNJ:
16.32%
MFA:
-95.52%
JNJ:
-52.60%
MFA:
-38.41%
JNJ:
-6.20%
Fundamentals
MFA:
$1.05B
JNJ:
$380.14B
MFA:
$0.82
JNJ:
$5.79
MFA:
12.59
JNJ:
27.27
MFA:
2.25
JNJ:
1.00
MFA:
$782.94M
JNJ:
$88.82B
MFA:
$757.07M
JNJ:
$61.35B
MFA:
$507.64M
JNJ:
$28.53B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MFA has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 0.59%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.
MFA
1.67%
1.67%
-7.00%
8.58%
-8.97%
0.59%
JNJ
11.30%
8.65%
0.70%
3.86%
4.30%
7.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MFA vs. JNJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MFA
JNJ
MFA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MFA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.51%, more than JNJ's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFA MFA Financial, Inc. | 13.51% | 13.74% | 12.42% | 16.95% | 8.44% | 8.35% | 10.46% | 11.98% | 10.10% | 10.48% | 12.12% | 10.01% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 3.11% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
MFA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MFA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.97%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MFA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities