MFA vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Performance
MFA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFA vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFA MFA Financial, Inc. | 6.89% | 6.07% | 2.63% | 30.66% | -37.20% | 27.71% | -40.87% | 27.54% | -5.85% | 14.30% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 18.59% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Fundamentals
MFA:
$2.52
JNJ:
$11.04
MFA:
3.81
JNJ:
22.12
MFA:
0.40
JNJ:
0.74
MFA:
2.04
JNJ:
6.29
MFA:
$330.13M
JNJ:
$94.19B
MFA:
$407.45M
JNJ:
$68.56B
MFA:
$341.51M
JNJ:
$39.85B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 18.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MFA has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 1.81%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.
MFA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
JNJ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- 63.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFA vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
MFA
JNJ
MFA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 3.67 | -3.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 4.95 | -4.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.67 | -0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 6.09 | -5.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 20.41 | -19.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 3.67 | -3.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.70 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.62 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.54 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFA and JNJ is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.03%, more than JNJ's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFA MFA Financial, Inc. | 15.03% | 15.47% | 13.74% | 12.42% | 16.95% | 8.44% | 8.35% | 10.46% | 11.98% | 10.10% | 10.48% | 12.12% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.13% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
MFA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and JNJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.52% | -50.67% | -44.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | -8.42% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.54% | -18.41% | -38.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.52% | -27.37% | -68.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.31% | -1.79% | -29.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -11.89% | -9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 2.51% | +4.24% |
Volatility
MFA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 4.43%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 4.43% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 10.94% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.80% | 19.11% | +9.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 16.67% | +15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.70% | 18.33% | +66.37% |
Financials
MFA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities