PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFA vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFA vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MFA has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 0.74%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.80% annualized return.


MFA

1D
-3.38%
1M
-9.94%
YTD
2.09%
6M
3.07%
1Y
13.88%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
0.74%

GOOG

1D
-0.76%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
13.43%
6M
11.09%
1Y
112.81%
3Y*
42.00%
5Y*
23.95%
10Y*
25.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFA vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
2.09%6.07%2.63%30.66%-37.20%27.71%-40.87%27.54%-5.85%14.30%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
13.43%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MFA and GOOG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.30

The correlation between MFA and GOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MFA:

$1.70

GOOG:

$13.11

PE Ratio

MFA:

5.38

GOOG:

27.12

PEG Ratio

MFA:

0.25

GOOG:

1.33

PS Ratio

MFA:

2.10

GOOG:

10.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFA:

$343.42M

GOOG:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFA:

$413.35M

GOOG:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

MFA:

$341.51M

GOOG:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFA vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFA
MFA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFA vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFAGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.64

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

5.47

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

19.89

-17.20

MFA vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFA and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFAGOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

3.98

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.77

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

0.89

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.82

-0.71

Drawdowns

MFA vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFAGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.52%

-44.60%

-50.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-20.75%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-29.35%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

-44.60%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.52%

-44.60%

-50.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.40%

-10.87%

-23.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.54%

-8.89%

-12.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

5.69%

-0.54%

Volatility

MFA vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to Alphabet Inc (GOOG) at 8.08%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFAGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.17%

8.08%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.88%

20.16%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

28.59%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.73%

31.10%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.78%

28.99%

+55.79%

Dividends

MFA vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.74%, more than GOOG's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
15.74%15.47%13.74%12.42%16.95%8.44%8.35%10.46%11.98%10.10%10.48%12.12%

Financials

MFA vs. GOOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B202220232024202520260
109.90B
(MFA) Total Revenue
(GOOG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MFA and GOOG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFA has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to GOOG (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFA dropped -95.52% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFA and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer