PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFA vs. LADR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFA vs. LADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than LADR's -4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MFA has underperformed LADR with an annualized return of 1.15%, while LADR has yielded a comparatively higher 6.25% annualized return.


MFA

1D
1.60%
1M
0.21%
YTD
6.33%
6M
5.69%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.15%

LADR

1D
0.89%
1M
1.90%
YTD
-4.97%
6M
-6.32%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFA vs. LADR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
6.33%6.07%2.63%30.66%-37.20%27.71%-40.87%27.54%-5.85%14.30%
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
-4.97%6.69%5.53%25.22%-8.95%31.28%-40.80%26.36%24.54%8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MFA and LADR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014

0.57

The correlation between MFA and LADR shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MFA:

$1.70

LADR:

$0.44

PE Ratio

MFA:

5.60

LADR:

23.39

PEG Ratio

MFA:

0.26

LADR:

1.11

PS Ratio

MFA:

2.19

LADR:

3.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFA:

$343.42M

LADR:

$400.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFA:

$413.35M

LADR:

$284.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

MFA:

$341.51M

LADR:

$276.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFA vs. LADR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFA
MFA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LADR
LADR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFA vs. LADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFALADRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.06

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

0.33

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

0.73

+2.41

MFA vs. LADR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the LADR Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFA and LADR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFA vs. LADR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than LADR's maximum drawdown of -81.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and LADR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFALADRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.52%

-81.63%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-14.68%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-20.22%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

-26.97%

-29.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.52%

-81.63%

-13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.67%

-9.32%

-22.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-18.28%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

6.66%

-1.10%

Volatility

MFA vs. LADR - Volatility Comparison

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) at 5.72%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFALADRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

5.72%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

14.53%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

18.39%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

24.76%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.77%

48.24%

+36.53%

Dividends

MFA vs. LADR - Dividend Comparison

MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.11%, more than LADR's 9.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
9.02%8.37%8.22%7.99%8.76%6.67%9.61%7.54%9.92%8.91%9.37%17.91%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
15.11%15.47%13.74%12.42%16.95%8.44%8.35%10.46%11.98%10.10%10.48%12.12%

Financials

MFA vs. LADR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Ladder Capital Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M202220232024202520260
103.34M
(MFA) Total Revenue
(LADR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MFA and LADR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFA has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to LADR (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFA dropped -95.52% vs LADR's -81.63%.

MFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFA and LADR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer