PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFA vs. FBRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFA vs. FBRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than FBRT's -13.93% return.


MFA

1D
1.60%
1M
0.21%
YTD
6.33%
6M
5.69%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.15%

FBRT

1D
2.80%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
-13.93%
6M
-15.70%
1Y
-11.63%
3Y*
-6.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFA vs. FBRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
6.33%6.07%2.63%30.66%-37.20%0.44%
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
-13.93%-9.17%3.73%16.56%-3.86%-10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MFA and FBRT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.62

The correlation between MFA and FBRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

MFA:

$1.70

FBRT:

$0.71

PE Ratio

MFA:

5.60

FBRT:

11.84

PS Ratio

MFA:

2.19

FBRT:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFA:

$343.42M

FBRT:

$411.64M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFA:

$413.35M

FBRT:

$228.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

MFA:

$341.51M

FBRT:

$218.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFA vs. FBRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFA
MFA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FBRT
FBRT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FBRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FBRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBRT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFA vs. FBRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFAFBRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.94

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.50

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

-0.99

+4.13

MFA vs. FBRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the FBRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFA and FBRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFA vs. FBRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than FBRT's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and FBRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFAFBRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.52%

-31.30%

-64.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-23.51%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-30.02%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.67%

-27.65%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-11.30%

-10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

11.82%

-6.26%

Volatility

MFA vs. FBRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) is 6.62%, while Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that MFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFAFBRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

9.11%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

23.56%

-6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

26.62%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

28.53%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.77%

28.53%

+56.24%

Dividends

MFA vs. FBRT - Dividend Comparison

MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.11%, which matches FBRT's 15.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
15.01%14.16%11.32%10.51%11.01%1.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
15.11%15.47%13.74%12.42%16.95%8.44%8.35%10.46%11.98%10.10%10.48%12.12%

Financials

MFA vs. FBRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M202220232024202520260
10.55M
(MFA) Total Revenue
(FBRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MFA and FBRT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBRT has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to MFA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFA dropped -95.52% vs FBRT's -31.30%.

MFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFA and FBRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer