FBRT vs. ECCC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBRT (Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.) and ECCC (Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.) are both stocks. FBRT operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while ECCC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, FBRT returned -4.71%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for ECCC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FBRT vs. ECCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBRT achieves a -14.75% return, which is significantly lower than ECCC's 3.89% return.

FBRT

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -14.75%
• 6M: -15.22%
• 1Y: -13.75%
• 3Y*: -4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECCC

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 3.93%
• 1Y: 14.89%
• 3Y*: 13.13%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBRT vs. ECCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FBRT Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.	-14.75%	-9.17%	3.73%	16.56%	-3.86%	-10.46%
ECCC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.	3.89%	16.21%	14.03%	14.18%	-13.45%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FBRT and ECCC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap FBRT : $667.38M ECCC : $3.30B
EPS FBRT : $0.71 ECCC : -$1.39
PS Ratio FBRT : 2.04 ECCC : 22.25
PB Ratio FBRT : 0.51 ECCC : 5.99
Total Revenue (TTM) FBRT : $411.64M ECCC : $141.34M
Gross Profit (TTM) FBRT : $228.04M ECCC : $113.66M
EBITDA (TTM) FBRT : $218.28M ECCC : -$133.96M

Return for Risk

FBRT vs. ECCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBRT

FBRT Risk / Return Rank: 19
FBRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FBRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FBRT Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FBRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FBRT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

ECCC

ECCC Risk / Return Rank: 80
ECCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ECCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ECCC Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ECCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ECCC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBRT vs. ECCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBRT	ECCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	1.31	-1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	1.89	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.26	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.48	-4.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	9.42	-10.57

FBRT vs. ECCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the ECCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBRT and ECCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBRT vs. ECCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBRT drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than ECCC's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBRT and ECCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBRT	ECCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.30%	-19.16%	-12.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.51%	-4.29%	-19.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.02%	-6.88%	-23.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.34%	-0.34%	-28.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.33%	-3.69%	-7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.98%	1.58%	+10.40%

Volatility

FBRT vs. ECCC - Volatility Comparison

Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) at 3.63%. This indicates that FBRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBRT	ECCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.61%	3.63%	+4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.60%	8.43%	+15.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.64%	11.42%	+15.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.51%	12.26%	+16.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.51%	12.24%	+16.27%

Dividends

FBRT vs. ECCC - Dividend Comparison

FBRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.15%, more than ECCC's 6.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECCC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.	6.52%	6.55%	7.10%	7.81%	7.95%	3.48%
FBRT Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.	15.15%	14.16%	11.32%	10.51%	11.01%	1.91%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBRT and ECCC in my portfolio?

FBRT and ECCC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBRT or ECCC?

FBRT has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to ECCC (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBRT dropped -31.30% vs ECCC's -19.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.