PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBRT vs. EC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FBRT vs. EC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) and Ecopetrol S.A. (EC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBRT achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than EC's 70.23% return.


FBRT

1D
-1.66%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-15.36%
6M
-16.70%
1Y
-13.90%
3Y*
-4.94%
5Y*
10Y*

EC

1D
-1.99%
1M
17.33%
YTD
70.23%
6M
83.41%
1Y
83.58%
3Y*
40.10%
5Y*
21.63%
10Y*
17.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBRT vs. EC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
-15.36%-9.17%3.73%16.56%-3.86%-10.46%
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
70.23%58.65%-24.25%41.83%-5.04%-16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FBRT and EC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.27

The correlation between FBRT and EC shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FBRT:

$662.59M

EC:

$33.41B

EPS

FBRT:

$0.71

EC:

COP 4.26K

PE Ratio

FBRT:

11.65

EC:

13.14

PS Ratio

FBRT:

2.03

EC:

0.99

PB Ratio

FBRT:

0.51

EC:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

FBRT:

$411.64M

EC:

COP 116.38T

Gross Profit (TTM)

FBRT:

$228.04M

EC:

COP 37.91T

EBITDA (TTM)

FBRT:

$218.28M

EC:

COP 42.24T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBRT vs. EC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBRT
FBRT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FBRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FBRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EC
EC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBRT vs. EC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) and Ecopetrol S.A. (EC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBRTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.35

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

6.37

-6.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

14.74

-15.91

FBRT vs. EC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the EC Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBRT and EC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBRT vs. EC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBRT drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum EC drawdown of -90.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBRT and EC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBRTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-90.16%

+58.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.51%

-13.20%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.02%

-38.00%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.85%

-17.68%

-11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-51.13%

+39.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.90%

5.75%

+6.15%

Volatility

FBRT vs. EC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) is 8.60%, while Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) has a volatility of 16.55%. This indicates that FBRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBRTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.60%

16.55%

-7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.59%

31.56%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.68%

38.23%

-11.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

37.86%

-9.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.52%

40.87%

-12.35%

Dividends

FBRT vs. EC - Dividend Comparison

FBRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.26%, more than EC's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EC
Ecopetrol S.A.
7.27%20.77%20.47%22.02%22.47%0.72%6.92%9.87%4.01%1.06%0.00%14.83%
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
15.26%14.16%11.32%10.51%11.01%1.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FBRT vs. EC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. and Ecopetrol S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00T20.00T30.00T40.00T20222023202420252026
10.55M
28.41T
(FBRT) Total Revenue
(EC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FBRT values in USD, EC values in COP

Frequently Asked Questions


FBRT and EC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EC has higher volatility (16.55%) compared to FBRT (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBRT dropped -31.30% vs EC's -90.16%.

EC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBRT and EC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer