METV vs. TOPW
METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TOPW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TOPW.
Performance
METV vs. TOPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than TOPW's 7.71% return.
METV
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METV vs. TOPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 1.54% | -2.67% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 7.71% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between METV and TOPW is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METV vs. TOPW — Risk / Return Rank
METV
TOPW
METV vs. TOPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METV | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METV | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.25 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
METV vs. TOPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than TOPW's maximum drawdown of -29.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and TOPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METV | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -29.87% | -29.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -10.02% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.00% | -12.88% | -13.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | — | — |
Volatility
METV vs. TOPW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METV | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.88% | 27.36% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 27.36% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 27.36% | +2.60% |
METV vs. TOPW - Expense Ratio Comparison
METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TOPW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
METV vs. TOPW - Dividend Comparison
METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TOPW's 40.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 40.33% | 21.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METV and TOPW have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METV is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METV is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TOPW.
TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 40.33%, compared with 0.18% for METV.
METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while TOPW is Derivative Income. METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TOPW tracks Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.99% for TOPW.
Find the right allocation for METV and TOPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer