METU vs. SPXL
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. METU is actively managed, while SPXL is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -49.17% vs 62.56% for SPXL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
METU vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -36.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 17.21% return.
METU
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -17.64%
- YTD
- -36.42%
- 6M
- -37.57%
- 1Y
- -49.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.56%
- 3Y*
- 46.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.27%
METU vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -36.42% | -1.01% | 28.79% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 17.21% | 31.94% | 26.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and SPXL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between METU and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
METU vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METU
SPXL
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
METU
SPXL
Basic Materials
METU
-
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
METU
-
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
METU
-
SPXL
Energy
METU
-
SPXL
Financial Services
METU
-
SPXL
Healthcare
METU
-
SPXL
Industrials
METU
-
SPXL
Real Estate
METU
-
SPXL
Technology
METU
-
SPXL
Utilities
METU
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
METU
SPXL
METU vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METU | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.28 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.35 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 9.57 | -10.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METU vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -76.86% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -26.77% | -34.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.36% | -10.44% | -48.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.32% | -16.09% | -8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.54% | 6.56% | +28.98% |
Volatility
METU vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 25.96% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) at 14.70%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.96% | 14.70% | +11.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.94% | 29.55% | +26.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.28% | 37.43% | +34.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.77% | 50.54% | +22.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.77% | 53.47% | +19.30% |
METU vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than SPXL's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 4.86% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and SPXL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (25.96%) compared to SPXL (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 1-year performance, SPXL leads with 62.56% vs -49.17% for METU. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 62.56% return vs -49.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.57% for SPXL.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer