METU vs. OOQB

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB).

METU and OOQB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Jun 5, 2024. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.

Performance

METU vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METU vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-29.17%	-29.80%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-28.65%	-13.30%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with METU having a -29.17% return and OOQB slightly higher at -28.65%.

METU

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -25.19%
• YTD: -29.17%
• 6M: -44.95%
• 1Y: -25.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -5.30%
• YTD: -28.65%
• 6M: -48.97%
• 1Y: -20.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

METU

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF

OOQB

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

METU vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 7
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 10
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 4

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 7
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 8
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METU	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	-0.35	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	-0.13	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.98	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.33	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	-0.73	-0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METU vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is comparable to the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and OOQB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METU	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	-0.35	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.57	+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between METU and OOQB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

METU vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than OOQB's 13.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	4.36%	3.00%	1.40%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	13.89%	9.53%	0.00%

Drawdowns

METU vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	METU	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.85%	-53.44%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.52%	-53.44%	-8.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.73%	-50.75%	-3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.41%	-20.16%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.95%	24.40%	+3.55%

Volatility

METU vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 27.24% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 16.29%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METU	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.24%	16.29%	+10.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.03%	46.00%	+8.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.75%	59.49%	+20.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.99%	61.79%	+10.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.99%	61.79%	+10.20%