METU vs. AMZU
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. METU is actively managed, while AMZU is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -44.10% vs 8.26% for AMZU. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for AMZU.
Performance
METU vs. AMZU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -29.87% return, which is significantly lower than AMZU's 3.58% return.
METU
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -9.48%
- YTD
- -29.87%
- 6M
- -31.83%
- 1Y
- -44.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -20.22%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METU vs. AMZU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -29.87% | -1.01% | 25.56% |
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 3.58% | -11.59% | 30.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and AMZU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between METU and AMZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
METU vs. AMZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METU
AMZU
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
METU
AMZU
-
Basic Materials
METU
-
AMZU
-
Consumer Cyclical
METU
-
AMZU
Consumer Defensive
METU
-
AMZU
-
Energy
METU
-
AMZU
-
Financial Services
METU
-
AMZU
-
Healthcare
METU
-
AMZU
-
Industrials
METU
-
AMZU
-
Real Estate
METU
-
AMZU
-
Technology
METU
-
AMZU
-
Utilities
METU
-
AMZU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. AMZU — Risk / Return Rank
METU
AMZU
METU vs. AMZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.08 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.19 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 0.43 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 0.14 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.23 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
METU vs. AMZU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, which is greater than AMZU's maximum drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and AMZU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -55.59% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -42.98% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.17% | -23.71% | -31.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -21.91% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.71% | 19.04% | +14.67% |
Volatility
METU vs. AMZU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 21.06% compared to Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) at 15.59%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.06% | 15.59% | +5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.10% | 41.11% | +12.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.03% | 60.06% | +10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.60% | 59.18% | +13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.60% | 59.18% | +13.42% |
METU vs. AMZU - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMZU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. AMZU - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than AMZU's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.86% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 4.40% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and AMZU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (21.06%) compared to AMZU (15.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs AMZU's -55.59%.
On 1-year performance, AMZU leads with 8.26% vs -44.10% for METU. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 15.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 8.26% return vs -44.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 4.40% for METU.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.06% for AMZU.
AMZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and AMZU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer