METL vs. LIT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).

METL and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METL is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Sep 9, 2025. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.

Performance

METL vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METL vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	6.41%	27.04%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	14.63%	33.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 14.63% return.

METL

• 1D: 6.47%
• 1M: -16.66%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 23.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIT

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 31.14%
• 1Y: 92.83%
• 3Y*: 6.29%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 14.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

METL

Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Return for Risk

METL vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 96
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METL	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	0.24	+1.38

Correlation

The correlation between METL and LIT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

METL vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than LIT's 0.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.93%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.42%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Drawdowns

METL vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-65.91%	+38.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.32%	-19.86%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-33.90%	+27.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.92%	34.57%	+10.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.92%	31.68%	+13.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.92%	30.50%	+14.42%