METL vs. EIS
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott, while EIS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net). METL is actively managed, while EIS is passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EIS.
Performance
METL vs. EIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a -6.10% return, which is significantly lower than EIS's 8.44% return.
METL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -19.31%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EIS
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 29.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
METL vs. EIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | -6.10% | 28.19% |
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 8.44% | 13.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and EIS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. EIS — Risk / Return Rank
METL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EIS
METL vs. EIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METL | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METL vs. EIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, smaller than the maximum EIS drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and EIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -51.94% | +23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.80% | -13.34% | -15.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -13.88% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.00% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. EIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.16% | 23.19% | +20.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 22.28% | +21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 21.27% | +22.89% |
METL vs. EIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than EIS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. EIS - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than EIS's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 1.06% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and EIS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.06% for METL.
METL is categorized as Natural Resources, while EIS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.59% for EIS.
Find the right allocation for METL and EIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer