METL vs. BATT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT).

METL and BATT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METL is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Sep 9, 2025. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.

Performance

METL vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METL vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	6.41%	27.04%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	7.90%	25.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 7.90% return.

METL

• 1D: 6.47%
• 1M: -16.66%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 23.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: 4.20%
• 1M: -8.43%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 81.61%
• 3Y*: 7.85%
• 5Y*: 1.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

METL

Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF

Return for Risk

METL vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METL	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	-0.05	+1.68

Correlation

The correlation between METL and BATT is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

METL vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than BATT's 1.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.93%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.72%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%

Drawdowns

METL vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-69.38%	+41.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.32%	-16.31%	-3.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-35.41%	+28.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.92%	32.37%	+12.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.92%	29.25%	+15.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.92%	30.55%	+14.37%