METI.L vs. NVDD.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and NVDD.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METI.L returned -22.49% vs -20.61% for NVDD.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with METI.L having a -17.17% return and NVDD.L slightly lower at -17.63%.
METI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- YTD
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- -22.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDD.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -16.13%
- YTD
- -17.63%
- 1Y
- -20.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | -17.17% | -0.90% | 3.56% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | -17.63% | -22.81% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between METI.L and NVDD.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. NVDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
NVDD.L
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METI.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.41 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | -0.62 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -52.76%, which is greater than NVDD.L's maximum drawdown of -46.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and NVDD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.76% | -46.58% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.76% | -46.58% | -6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.92% | -43.38% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.54% | -25.59% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.75% | 30.94% | +5.81% |
Volatility
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) at 8.85%. This indicates that METI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 8.85% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.50% | 21.41% | +5.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.55% | 52.97% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 48.84% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.42% | 48.84% | -4.42% |
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METI.L and NVDD.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
METI.L vs. NVDD.L - Dividend Comparison
METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.65%, while NVDD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | 20.65% | 20.59% | 3.05% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METI.L and NVDD.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METI.L and NVDD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and NVDD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer