NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L).
NVDD.L and VUSA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVDD.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 18, 2024. VUSA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 14, 2019.
Performance
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | -14.11% | -22.81% | 3.90% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | -3.13% | 9.39% | 9.91% |
Different Trading Currencies
NVDD.L is traded in GBp, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDD.L achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than VUSA.L's -3.13% return.
NVDD.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -14.11%
- 6M
- -18.25%
- 1Y
- -5.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUSA.L
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 14.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
NVDD.L
VUSA.L
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDD.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 0.96 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 1.40 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.20 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.06 | -2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 7.07 | -7.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDD.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.96 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 1.00 | -1.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDD.L and VUSA.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
NVDD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, which is greater than VUSA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDD.L and VUSA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDD.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | -25.47% | -18.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.58% | -10.49% | -31.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.96% | -4.76% | -36.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.99% | -3.22% | -18.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.65% | 2.07% | +20.58% |
Volatility
NVDD.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that NVDD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVDD.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 3.74% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.15% | 8.25% | +38.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.49% | 15.31% | +39.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.75% | 14.37% | +36.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.75% | 15.67% | +35.08% |