METI.L vs. QQQY.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - METI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQY.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METI.L returned -21.99% vs 31.70% for QQQY.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQY.L.
Performance
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METI.L is traded in GBp, while QQQY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METI.L achieves a -17.17% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.L's 14.95% return.
METI.L
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- -17.17%
- 6M
- -16.92%
- 1Y
- -21.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | -17.17% | -0.90% | 11.70% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 14.95% | 6.04% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between METI.L and QQQY.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
QQQY.L
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METI.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.43 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 5.11 | -5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 12.98 | -14.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METI.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 2.35 | -3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.63 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, which is greater than QQQY.L's maximum drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and QQQY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.37% | -22.98% | -18.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.70% | -6.17% | -32.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.12% | -1.33% | -32.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -5.39% | -11.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.38% | 2.44% | +17.94% |
Volatility
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) at 4.84%. This indicates that METI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 4.84% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.51% | 10.41% | +13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.01% | 13.41% | +16.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 21.84% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 21.84% | +8.83% |
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
METI.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison
METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.64%, less than QQQY.L's 68.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | 18.64% | 20.59% | 3.05% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 68.52% | 120.63% | 8.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METI.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METI.L.
METI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.45% for QQQY.L.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and QQQY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer