METI.L vs. TLTI.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and TLTI.L (IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
METI.L vs. TLTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METI.L is traded in GBp, while TLTI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLTI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
METI.L
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- -17.17%
- 6M
- -16.92%
- 1Y
- -21.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTI.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. TLTI.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
TLTI.L
METI.L vs. TLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | — | — |
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. TLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.12% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.38% | — | — |
Volatility
METI.L vs. TLTI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.01% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.67% | — | — |
METI.L vs. TLTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METI.L and TLTI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
METI.L vs. TLTI.L - Dividend Comparison
METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.64%, while TLTI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | 18.64% | 20.59% | 3.05% |
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METI.L and TLTI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and TLTI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer