PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METI.L vs. SMH3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

METI.L is traded in GBp, while SMH3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METI.L achieves a -17.17% return, which is significantly lower than SMH3.L's 244.77% return.


METI.L

1D
4.75%
1M
6.66%
YTD
-17.17%
6M
-16.92%
1Y
-21.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMH3.L

1D
-14.80%
1M
22.46%
YTD
244.77%
6M
229.08%
1Y
709.07%
3Y*
138.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METI.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP
-17.17%-0.90%11.70%
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
244.77%62.38%-7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between METI.L and SMH3.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METI.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METI.L
METI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
METI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
METI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
METI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METI.LSMH3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.55

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

18.70

-19.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

59.69

-60.76

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METI.L and SMH3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METI.LSMH3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

7.56

-8.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.47

-0.63

Drawdowns

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, smaller than the maximum SMH3.L drawdown of -87.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METI.L and SMH3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METI.LSMH3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.37%

-87.38%

+46.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.70%

-37.56%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.12%

-20.23%

-13.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-47.63%

+31.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.38%

11.79%

+8.59%

Volatility

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) is 7.69%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a volatility of 41.49%. This indicates that METI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METI.LSMH3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

41.49%

-33.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.51%

72.14%

-48.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.01%

92.91%

-62.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.67%

99.46%

-68.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.67%

99.46%

-68.79%

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

METI.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison

METI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.64%, while SMH3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
METI.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP
18.64%20.59%3.05%
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


METI.L and SMH3.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMH3.L.

METI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMH3.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.75% for SMH3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METI.L and SMH3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer