NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L).

NVDD.L and GOOO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVDD.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 18, 2024. GOOO.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024.

Performance

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP	-14.11%	-22.81%	14.15%
GOOO.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP	-8.29%	35.20%	25.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDD.L achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than GOOO.L's -8.29% return.

NVDD.L

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: -14.11%
• 6M: -18.25%
• 1Y: -5.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOO.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -5.08%
• YTD: -8.29%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 50.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDD.L and GOOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

NVDD.L

IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP

GOOO.L

IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP

Return for Risk

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDD.L

NVDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
NVDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NVDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
NVDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
NVDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NVDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

GOOO.L

GOOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GOOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GOOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GOOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GOOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDD.L	GOOO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.93	-2.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	2.68	-2.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.32	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	3.13	-3.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	10.51	-10.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDD.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDD.L and GOOO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDD.L	GOOO.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	1.93	-2.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	1.31	-1.70

Correlation

The correlation between NVDD.L and GOOO.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison

NVDD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.98%.

	TTM	2025	2024
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP	0.00%	0.00%	10.63%
GOOO.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP	14.98%	11.49%	1.94%

Drawdowns

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, which is greater than GOOO.L's maximum drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDD.L and GOOO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDD.L	GOOO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.37%	-28.28%	-16.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.58%	-16.31%	-25.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.96%	-13.96%	-27.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.99%	-8.21%	-13.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.65%	4.86%	+17.79%

Volatility

NVDD.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L) at 6.04%. This indicates that NVDD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDD.L	GOOO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	6.04%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.15%	16.08%	+31.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.49%	25.95%	+28.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.75%	25.62%	+25.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.75%	25.62%	+25.13%