METI.L vs. 3NIE.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and 3NIE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - METI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 3NIE.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index. METI.L is actively managed, while 3NIE.L is passively managed. METI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3NIE.L.
Performance
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METI.L is traded in GBp, while 3NIE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3NIE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
METI.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3NIE.L
- 1D
- -16.49%
- 1M
- -29.61%
- YTD
- -40.83%
- 6M
- -34.02%
- 1Y
- -22.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
3NIE.L
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METI.L | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.00 | — |
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -100.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -87.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -99.94% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -96.83% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.47% | — |
Volatility
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | 3NIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 59.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 120.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 180.03% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 29,874.84% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 29,874.84% | — |
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 3NIE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
METI.L vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither METI.L nor 3NIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, METI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3NIE.L.
METI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 3NIE.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.75% for 3NIE.L.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and 3NIE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer