3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR (3NFE.L).

3NIE.L and 3NFE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3NIE.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. 3NFE.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NFLX Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. Both 3NIE.L and 3NFE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR (3NFE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
3NIE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities	5.39%	-21.24%
3NFE.L Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR	-9.01%	-31.32%

Different Trading Currencies

3NIE.L is traded in USD, while 3NFE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3NFE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3NIE.L achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than 3NFE.L's -9.01% return.

3NIE.L

• 1D: 5.91%
• 1M: 84.55%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3NFE.L

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -9.01%
• 6M: -59.91%
• 1Y: -35.10%
• 3Y*: 70.55%
• 5Y*: -44.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3NIE.L and 3NFE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

3NIE.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities

3NFE.L

Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR

Return for Risk

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3NFE.L

3NFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
3NFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
3NFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
3NFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
3NFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
3NFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR (3NFE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3NIE.L	3NFE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.31	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between 3NIE.L and 3NFE.L is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3NIE.L nor 3NFE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3NIE.L vs. 3NFE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3NIE.L drawdown since its inception was -60.65%, smaller than the maximum 3NFE.L drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3NIE.L and 3NFE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3NIE.L	3NFE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.65%	-99.86%	+39.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-86.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.25%	-97.37%	+79.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.03%	-81.65%	+42.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	50.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	3NIE.L	3NFE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	76.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	164.11%	99.18%	+64.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	164.11%	124.94%	+39.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	164.11%	123.84%	+40.27%