3NIE.L vs. SCHC
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC).
3NIE.L and SCHC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3NIE.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. SCHC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). It was launched on Jan 14, 2010. Both 3NIE.L and SCHC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3NIE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities | 5.39% | -21.24% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 4.13% | 4.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3NIE.L achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 4.13% return.
3NIE.L
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- 84.55%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
3NIE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
3NIE.L vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
3NIE.L
SCHC
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3NIE.L | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.38 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between 3NIE.L and SCHC is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
3NIE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3NIE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.52% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Drawdowns
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3NIE.L drawdown since its inception was -60.65%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3NIE.L and SCHC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3NIE.L | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.65% | -43.94% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.25% | -8.01% | -10.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.03% | -10.13% | -28.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility
3NIE.L vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 3NIE.L | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 164.11% | 17.40% | +146.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 164.11% | 17.33% | +146.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.11% | 17.88% | +146.23% |