METD vs. HOOG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while HOOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 24.41% vs -61.45% for HOOG. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.

Performance

METD vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -60.99% return.

METD

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 20.93%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.68%

HOOG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -43.77%
• 6M: -47.78%
• YTD: -60.99%
• 1Y: -61.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	$9.83M	$14.42M	$16.77M
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	$10.85M	$12.45M	$7.88M

METD vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	10.02%	-16.74%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-60.99%	320.19%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and HOOG is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	-0.41

Return for Risk

METD vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 32
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 35
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 6
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METD vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METD	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-0.46	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	-0.04	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.00	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	-0.74	+1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	-1.05	+3.55

METD vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METD vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	METD	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-86.94%	+40.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-86.94%	+60.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.29%	-81.80%	+52.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.87%	-41.73%	+12.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.39%	60.82%	-49.43%

Volatility

METD vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 15.23%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.80%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METD	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.23%	35.80%	-20.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.46%	107.69%	-77.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.18%	140.37%	-100.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.75%	144.04%	-106.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.75%	144.04%	-106.29%

METD vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

METD vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than HOOG's 31.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	31.54%	12.30%	0.00%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.51%	3.35%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METD and HOOG in my portfolio?

METD and HOOG have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METD or HOOG?

HOOG has higher volatility (35.80%) compared to METD (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

Which ETF is better, METD or HOOG?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 24.41% vs -61.45% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 15.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METD or HOOG?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 24.41% return vs -61.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METD or HOOG?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METD or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.54%, compared with 2.51% for METD.

What is the main difference between METD and HOOG?

METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while HOOG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.75% for HOOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.