METD vs. TERG
METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TERG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
METD vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 229.64% return.
METD
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 1.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- 39.95%
- YTD
- 229.64%
- 6M
- 218.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METD vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 1.66% | -8.77% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 229.64% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between METD and TERG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METD vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
METD
TERG
METD vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.29 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 9.90 | -10.34 |
Drawdowns
METD vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum TERG drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.03% | -49.52% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.66% | -15.98% | -18.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.61% | -13.73% | -14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | — | — |
Volatility
METD vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.57% | 139.25% | -103.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 139.25% | -102.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 139.25% | -102.84% |
METD vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
METD vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.69% | 3.35% | 2.30% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METD and TERG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.
METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TERG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for METD and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer