METD vs. BERZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. METD is actively managed, while BERZ is passively managed. Over the past year, METD returned -2.77% vs -75.61% for BERZ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BERZ.

Performance

METD vs. BERZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a -7.12% return, which is significantly higher than BERZ's -54.50% return.

METD

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -11.46%
• 6M: -12.68%
• YTD: -7.12%
• 1Y: -2.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BERZ

• 1D: 8.13%
• 1M: 12.66%
• 6M: -51.50%
• YTD: -54.50%
• 1Y: -75.61%
• 3Y*: -72.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METD vs. BERZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	-7.12%	-17.33%	-15.84%
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-54.50%	-78.81%	-48.58%

Correlation

The correlation between METD and BERZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.58

The correlation between METD and BERZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

METD vs. BERZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 9
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 10
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BERZ

BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METD vs. BERZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METD	BERZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	-0.91	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	-1.80	+1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.81	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	-0.90	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	-1.42	+1.18

METD vs. BERZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METD Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the BERZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METD and BERZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METD vs. BERZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum BERZ drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and BERZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	METD	BERZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-99.80%	+53.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-83.72%	+57.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-98.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.30%	-99.73%	+59.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-72.17%	+43.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.56%	53.42%	-41.86%

Volatility

METD vs. BERZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 16.33%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a volatility of 25.86%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BERZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METD	BERZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.33%	25.86%	-9.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.74%	65.71%	-33.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.00%	82.83%	-43.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.46%	92.62%	-55.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.46%	92.62%	-55.16%

METD vs. BERZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BERZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

METD vs. BERZ - Dividend Comparison

METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.97%	3.35%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METD and BERZ in my portfolio?

METD and BERZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METD or BERZ?

BERZ has higher volatility (25.86%) compared to METD (16.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs BERZ's -99.80%.

Which ETF is better, METD or BERZ?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with -2.77% vs -75.61% for BERZ. On fees, BERZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 16.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METD or BERZ?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a -2.77% return vs -75.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METD or BERZ?

BERZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METD or BERZ?

METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.

What is the main difference between METD and BERZ?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.95% for BERZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.