METC vs. ARRNF
METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) and ARRNF (American Rare Earths Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — METC in Coking Coal, ARRNF in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 5 years, METC returned 26.81%/yr vs 68.17%/yr for ARRNF. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
METC vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -15.22% return, which is significantly lower than ARRNF's 28.10% return.
METC
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 48.88%
- 3Y*
- 30.21%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- —
ARRNF
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- 28.10%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 49.44%
- 3Y*
- 34.73%
- 5Y*
- 68.17%
- 10Y*
- —
METC vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -15.22% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 372.22% | 28.00% |
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 28.10% | 23.89% | 41.25% | -11.60% | 4.42% | 550.00% | -20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between METC and ARRNF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020 | 0.06 |
The correlation between METC and ARRNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
METC:
-$1.62
ARRNF:
-A$0.02
METC:
$523.58M
ARRNF:
-A$128.85K
METC:
$10.83M
ARRNF:
-A$385.87K
METC:
$723.00K
ARRNF:
-A$12.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METC vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank
METC
ARRNF
METC vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METC | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.72 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 0.99 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METC vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, roughly equal to the maximum ARRNF drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and ARRNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METC | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -83.01% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.80% | -69.13% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.80% | -69.13% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.80% | -83.01% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.03% | -60.46% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.05% | -46.27% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.60% | 49.90% | +4.70% |
Volatility
METC vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) is 21.68%, while American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) has a volatility of 26.35%. This indicates that METC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARRNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METC | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.68% | 26.35% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.83% | 51.26% | +10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.03% | 126.90% | -24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.20% | 314.54% | -232.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.87% | 289.79% | -213.92% |
Dividends
METC vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison
Neither METC nor ARRNF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% |
Financials
METC vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
METC and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARRNF has higher volatility (26.35%) compared to METC (21.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METC dropped -86.53% vs ARRNF's -83.01%.
METC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METC and ARRNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer