PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BELT vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BELT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BELT achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -4.73% return.


BELT

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.34%
YTD
19.28%
6M
18.72%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IAU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-4.73%
6M
-8.68%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
18.02%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BELT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BELT
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
19.28%12.42%-1.87%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-4.73%63.95%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BELT and IAU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2024

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BELT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BELT
BELT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BELT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BELT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BELT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BELT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BELT Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BELT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BELTIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

0.88

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

2.37

+7.70

BELT vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BELT Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BELT and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BELT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BELT drawdown since its inception was -23.05%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELT and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BELTIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.05%

-45.14%

+22.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-24.40%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-23.87%

+23.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-15.97%

+12.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

9.07%

-6.11%

Volatility

BELT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT) is 6.34%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that BELT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BELTIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

8.10%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

24.23%

-9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

27.38%

-9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

18.18%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

15.98%

+5.40%

BELT vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BELT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BELT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

BELT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BELT and IAU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to BELT (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELT dropped -23.05% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 1-year performance, BELT leads with 29.76% vs 21.45% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BELT has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BELT has performed better with a 29.76% return vs 21.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BELT.

BELT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

BELT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IAU is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BELT and 0.25% for IAU.

BELT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BELT and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer