PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BELT vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BELT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BELT achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -6.16% return.


BELT

1D
2.63%
1M
-1.81%
6M
11.93%
YTD
14.68%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.75%

IAU

1D
-1.46%
1M
-1.73%
6M
-16.48%
YTD
-6.16%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
27.40%
5Y*
17.12%
10Y*
11.21%
ALL TIME*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.56K$31.09K$73.23K
$349.43M$363.40M$472.72M

BELT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BELT
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
14.68%12.42%-1.87%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-6.16%63.95%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BELT and IAU is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2024

0.14

The correlation between BELT and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BELT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BELT
BELT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BELT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BELT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BELT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BELT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BELT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BELT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BELTIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

0.87

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

1.88

+3.19

BELT vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BELT Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BELT and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BELT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BELT drawdown since its inception was -23.05%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELT and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BELTIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.05%

-45.14%

+22.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-26.36%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-25.01%

+20.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-16.02%

+12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

12.16%

-8.94%

Volatility

BELT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 6.35%. This indicates that BELT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BELTIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

6.35%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

23.35%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

27.92%

-8.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

18.42%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

16.08%

+5.47%

BELT vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BELT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BELT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

BELT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BELT and IAU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BELT has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to IAU (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELT dropped -23.05% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 1-year performance, IAU leads with 20.35% vs 18.69% for BELT. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IAU has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 18.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BELT.

BELT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

BELT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IAU is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BELT and 0.25% for IAU.

BELT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BELT and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer