PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MELI vs. CLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MELI vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MELI achieves a -21.08% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MELI has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 28.09%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.71% annualized return.


MELI

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.77%
YTD
-21.08%
6M
-21.15%
1Y
-32.89%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
28.09%

CLS

1D
1.88%
1M
5.52%
YTD
32.99%
6M
28.26%
1Y
200.71%
3Y*
207.28%
5Y*
116.26%
10Y*
43.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MELI vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
-21.08%18.46%8.20%85.71%-37.24%-19.51%192.90%95.30%-6.93%101.99%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
32.99%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MELI and CLS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2007

0.33

The correlation between MELI and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MELI:

$80.59B

CLS:

$45.48B

EPS

MELI:

$37.87

CLS:

$8.28

PE Ratio

MELI:

41.97

CLS:

47.45

PEG Ratio

MELI:

0.25

CLS:

0.64

PS Ratio

MELI:

2.63

CLS:

3.30

PB Ratio

MELI:

11.07

CLS:

21.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

MELI:

$30.67B

CLS:

$13.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MELI:

$13.95B

CLS:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

MELI:

$3.11B

CLS:

$1.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MELI vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MELI
MELI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MELI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MELI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MELI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MELI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MELI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MELI vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MELICLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.37

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

6.91

-7.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

16.83

-18.25

MELI vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MELI Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MELI and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MELI vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MELI drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MELI and CLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MELICLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.49%

-96.93%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.82%

-29.24%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.82%

-53.96%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.64%

-53.96%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.12%

-80.60%

+11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.18%

-16.78%

-22.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-73.31%

+49.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.24%

11.98%

+11.26%

Volatility

MELI vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) is 9.96%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that MELI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MELICLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.96%

27.54%

-17.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.79%

55.42%

-25.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.48%

72.65%

-33.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.65%

57.70%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.88%

49.97%

-1.09%

Dividends

MELI vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither MELI nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.19%0.38%0.36%

Financials

MELI vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MercadoLibre, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.72B
4.05B
(MELI) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MELI vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MercadoLibre, Inc. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
50.1%
10.8%
Portfolio components
MELI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MercadoLibre, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.86B and revenue of 7.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

MELI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MercadoLibre, Inc. reported an operating income of 611.00M and revenue of 7.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

MELI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MercadoLibre, Inc. reported a net income of 417.00M and revenue of 7.72B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MELI and CLS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to MELI (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MELI dropped -89.49% vs CLS's -96.93%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MELI and CLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer