MEGMX vs. GLLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEGMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and GLLSX (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, MEGMX returned 9.12%/yr vs 18.30%/yr for GLLSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEGMX charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLLSX.

Performance

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGMX achieves a 37.52% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 46.58% return.

MEGMX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 13.32%
• YTD: 37.52%
• 6M: 39.97%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: 27.11%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: —

GLLSX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 11.34%
• YTD: 46.58%
• 6M: 50.65%
• 1Y: 88.61%
• 3Y*: 29.36%
• 5Y*: 18.30%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	37.52%	29.37%	11.11%	8.46%	-20.94%	-1.90%	61.26%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	46.58%	34.81%	0.73%	21.35%	-23.04%	36.50%	32.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and GLLSX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020	0.83

The correlation between MEGMX and GLLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX

MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

GLLSX

GLLSX Risk / Return Rank: 96
GLLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GLLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEGMX	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.47	4.14	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.43	4.78	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.74	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	6.17	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.23	24.54	-7.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the GLLSX Sharpe Ratio of 4.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and GLLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEGMX	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47	4.14	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	1.02	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.69	+0.31

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and GLLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEGMX	GLLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.64%	-32.59%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	-14.39%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-20.95%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.03%	-30.02%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-7.92%	-6.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	3.61%	+0.25%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) have volatilities of 9.46% and 9.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEGMX	GLLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	9.95%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.19%	19.05%	-1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	21.43%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	18.09%	-0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	17.80%	-0.07%

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEGMX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than GLLSX's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	1.28%	1.88%	0.74%	0.77%	29.32%	22.85%	0.00%	3.38%	9.47%	8.40%	1.09%	0.94%
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.16%	2.97%	0.92%	1.82%	1.81%	7.76%	2.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEGMX and GLLSX in my portfolio?

MEGMX and GLLSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEGMX or GLLSX?

GLLSX has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to MEGMX (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGMX dropped -37.64% vs GLLSX's -32.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.