MEGMX vs. MAPTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MEGMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and MAPTX (Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund) are both mutual funds - MEGMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Matthews, while MAPTX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Matthews. Over the past 5 years, MEGMX returned 9.30%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for MAPTX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEGMX charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for MAPTX.

Performance

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MEGMX having a 39.17% return and MAPTX slightly lower at 38.53%.

MEGMX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 10.14%
• YTD: 39.17%
• 6M: 40.98%
• 1Y: 63.29%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: —

MAPTX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 9.12%
• YTD: 38.53%
• 6M: 40.60%
• 1Y: 68.37%
• 3Y*: 21.81%
• 5Y*: 2.00%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	39.17%	29.37%	11.11%	8.46%	-20.94%	-1.90%	61.26%
MAPTX Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund	38.53%	30.07%	3.25%	-4.82%	-20.69%	-17.92%	50.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and MAPTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020	0.91

The correlation between MEGMX and MAPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. MAPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX

MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

MAPTX

MAPTX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MAPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MAPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MAPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MAPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MAPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEGMX	MAPTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	3.22	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	3.80	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.63	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	5.12	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.06	18.58	-2.52

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the MAPTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and MAPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum MAPTX drawdown of -69.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and MAPTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEGMX	MAPTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.64%	-69.79%	+32.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	-14.03%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-22.23%	+3.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.03%	-48.55%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.48%	-17.42%	+2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	3.81%	+0.25%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) have volatilities of 12.70% and 12.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEGMX	MAPTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.70%	12.64%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.69%	20.22%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.55%	22.31%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	20.59%	-2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.25%	18.53%	-0.28%

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPTX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEGMX vs. MAPTX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than MAPTX's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAPTX Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund	1.68%	2.33%	8.93%	2.93%	8.52%	4.85%	5.74%	3.44%	4.78%	1.25%	2.61%	11.18%
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.14%	2.97%	0.92%	1.82%	1.81%	7.76%	2.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEGMX and MAPTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MEGMX and MAPTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MEGMX or MAPTX?

MEGMX has higher volatility (12.70%) compared to MAPTX (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGMX dropped -37.64% vs MAPTX's -69.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.