PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGMX vs. MASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGMX achieves a 35.94% return, which is significantly lower than MASGX's 44.40% return.


MEGMX

1D
2.15%
1M
13.21%
YTD
35.94%
6M
38.19%
1Y
62.89%
3Y*
26.62%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*

MASGX

1D
1.73%
1M
9.29%
YTD
44.40%
6M
46.24%
1Y
69.02%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
35.94%29.37%11.11%8.46%-20.94%-1.90%61.26%
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
44.40%22.83%-2.51%7.99%-14.37%5.33%67.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and MASGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.84

The correlation between MEGMX and MASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. MASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX
MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MASGX
MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEGMXMASGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.45

3.37

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.40

4.14

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.59

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

4.83

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.25

17.99

-1.75

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is comparable to the MASGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and MASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEGMXMASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

3.37

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.42

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.67

+0.32

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum MASGX drawdown of -36.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and MASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGMXMASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-36.34%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-14.20%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-24.94%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.03%

-36.34%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-11.24%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

3.81%

+0.05%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) have volatilities of 9.45% and 9.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEGMXMASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.45%

9.54%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

18.97%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

21.92%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

20.83%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

18.67%

-0.94%

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MASGX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEGMX vs. MASGX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than MASGX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
3.87%5.58%2.58%7.52%5.39%2.60%5.66%1.36%4.52%3.70%1.47%
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.19%2.97%0.92%1.82%1.81%7.76%2.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MEGMX and MASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MASGX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to MEGMX (9.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGMX dropped -37.64% vs MASGX's -36.34%.

MEGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEGMX and MASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer