PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGMX vs. ASIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
-0.31%29.37%11.11%6.17%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
1.94%32.06%3.41%0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGMX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than ASIA's 1.94% return.


MEGMX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-13.91%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
2.52%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*

ASIA

1D
3.32%
1M
-10.98%
YTD
1.94%
6M
5.62%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MEGMX vs. ASIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ASIA's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. ASIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX
MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ASIA
ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEGMXASIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.64

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.19

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.38

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.52

8.98

-3.45

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the ASIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and ASIA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEGMXASIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.64

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and ASIA is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than ASIA's 1.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.98%2.97%0.92%1.82%1.81%7.76%2.26%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
1.03%1.05%0.58%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than ASIA's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and ASIA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGMXASIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-23.95%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-14.47%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.34%

-11.63%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-5.00%

-9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.84%

+0.17%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. ASIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) is 8.36%, while Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that MEGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MEGMXASIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

11.40%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

16.54%

-3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

21.58%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

19.47%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

19.47%

-2.24%