PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
GLLSX vs. EMXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GLLSX vs. EMXC

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC).

GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000. EMXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2017.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLLSX or EMXC.

Correlation

The correlation between GLLSX and EMXC is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

GLLSX:

7.03%

EMXC:

16.27%

Max Drawdown

GLLSX:

-0.49%

EMXC:

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

GLLSX:

0.00%

EMXC:

-1.51%

Returns By Period

GLLSX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EMXC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLLSX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

GLLSX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLLSX vs. EMXC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLLSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLLSX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
EMXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMXC is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMXC is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

GLLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than EMXC's 2.57% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLLSX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund		0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and EMXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...