PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLLSX vs. EMXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLLSX and EMXC is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.67%
-5.42%
GLLSX
EMXC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLLSX:

0.03

EMXC:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

GLLSX:

0.13

EMXC:

0.46

Omega Ratio

GLLSX:

1.02

EMXC:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

GLLSX:

0.01

EMXC:

0.34

Martin Ratio

GLLSX:

0.08

EMXC:

0.73

Ulcer Index

GLLSX:

5.30%

EMXC:

5.22%

Daily Std Dev

GLLSX:

13.69%

EMXC:

14.08%

Max Drawdown

GLLSX:

-62.12%

EMXC:

-42.80%

Current Drawdown

GLLSX:

-34.02%

EMXC:

-7.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLLSX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 2.76% return.


GLLSX

YTD

0.16%

1M

-2.33%

6M

-7.67%

1Y

-0.06%

5Y*

-1.59%

10Y*

-0.45%

EMXC

YTD

2.76%

1M

-0.19%

6M

-5.42%

1Y

3.37%

5Y*

5.36%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLLSX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLLSX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


GLLSX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
Expense ratio chart for GLLSX: current value at 1.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.23%
Expense ratio chart for EMXC: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLLSX vs. EMXC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLLSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLLSX is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMXC is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLLSX, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.030.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLLSX, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.130.46
The chart of Omega ratio for GLLSX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.021.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLLSX, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.010.34
The chart of Martin ratio for GLLSX, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.080.73
GLLSX
EMXC

The current GLLSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLLSX and EMXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.03
0.27
GLLSX
EMXC

Dividends

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

GLLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than EMXC's 2.62% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLLSX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
0.60%0.60%0.77%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.85%1.14%1.09%1.08%0.94%3.56%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.62%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and EMXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-34.02%
-7.97%
GLLSX
EMXC

Volatility

GLLSX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) is 3.94%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that GLLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.94%
4.26%
GLLSX
EMXC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab