GLLSX vs. EMXC
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC).
GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000. EMXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2017.
Performance
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 8.83% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 5.06% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 9.42% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLLSX achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 9.42% return.
GLLSX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- 52.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
EMXC
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLLSX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLLSX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
GLLSX
EMXC
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 2.34 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 3.02 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.44 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 3.39 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | 14.12 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.34 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.51 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.40 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLLSX and EMXC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
GLLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than EMXC's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.72% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.57% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and EMXC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.59% | -42.81% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -14.41% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.02% | -28.91% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -9.89% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -10.35% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.46% | -0.02% |
Volatility
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 10.61%. This indicates that GLLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 10.61% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | 16.16% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 20.60% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 16.71% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 19.51% | -2.14% |