GLLSX vs. EMXC
GLLSX (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both funds - GLLSX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Aberdeen, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, GLLSX returned 18.47%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLLSX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLLSX achieves a 49.19% return, which is significantly higher than EMXC's 37.89% return.
GLLSX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 49.19%
- 6M
- 51.55%
- 1Y
- 86.84%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
EMXC
- 1D
- -6.44%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 37.89%
- 6M
- 39.80%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 27.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 49.19% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 5.13% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.89% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLLSX and EMXC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GLLSX and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLLSX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
GLLSX
EMXC
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.50 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.08 | 4.74 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.81 | 18.14 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.59% | -42.81% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -14.41% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.95% | -19.12% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.02% | -28.91% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.44% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -10.15% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 3.76% | +0.07% |
Volatility
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) is 13.51%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that GLLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLLSX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.51% | 14.74% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.41% | 23.44% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 25.27% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.40% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 20.25% | -2.08% |
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLLSX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLLSX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
GLLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than EMXC's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.93% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.26% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLLSX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to GLLSX (13.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLLSX dropped -32.59% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
GLLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLLSX and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer