GLLSX vs. EAEMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLLSX (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and EAEMX (Parametric Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, GLLSX returned 15.51%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for EAEMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLLSX charges 1.23%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for EAEMX.

Performance

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLLSX achieves a 49.19% return, which is significantly higher than EAEMX's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GLLSX has outperformed EAEMX with an annualized return of 15.51%, while EAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.36% annualized return.

GLLSX

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 10.25%
• YTD: 49.19%
• 6M: 51.55%
• 1Y: 86.84%
• 3Y*: 29.67%
• 5Y*: 18.47%
• 10Y*: 15.51%

EAEMX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.11%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 30.31%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	49.19%	34.81%	0.73%	21.35%	-23.04%	36.50%	15.93%	23.64%	-11.50%	23.06%
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	11.85%	27.16%	5.39%	9.46%	-11.27%	4.19%	2.65%	12.32%	-14.02%	27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GLLSX and EAEMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.81

The correlation between GLLSX and EAEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLLSX vs. EAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLLSX

GLLSX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GLLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GLLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GLLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GLLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EAEMX

EAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 74
EAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLLSX	EAEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.58	2.49	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	3.35	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.49	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.08	3.09	+2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.81	11.13	+11.68

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLLSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.58, which is higher than the EAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLLSX and EAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum EAEMX drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and EAEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLLSX	EAEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.59%	-62.70%	+30.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.39%	-9.90%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.95%	-11.74%	-9.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.02%	-24.73%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.59%	-44.16%	+11.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.23%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-13.45%	+5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	2.74%	+1.09%

Volatility

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a higher volatility of 13.51% compared to Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) at 5.07%. This indicates that GLLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLLSX	EAEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.51%	5.07%	+8.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.41%	10.82%	+11.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	12.34%	+12.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.85%	11.76%	+7.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	13.46%	+4.71%

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLLSX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EAEMX's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLLSX vs. EAEMX - Dividend Comparison

GLLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than EAEMX's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	2.53%	2.83%	3.00%	2.71%	4.40%	1.64%	1.08%	2.48%	2.14%	2.31%	1.52%	1.68%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	1.26%	1.88%	0.74%	0.77%	29.32%	22.85%	0.00%	3.38%	9.47%	8.40%	1.09%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLLSX and EAEMX in my portfolio?

GLLSX and EAEMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLLSX or EAEMX?

GLLSX has higher volatility (13.51%) compared to EAEMX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLLSX dropped -32.59% vs EAEMX's -62.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.