PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGMX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.87%29.37%11.11%8.46%-20.94%-1.90%61.26%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
3.01%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%15.98%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MEGMX having a 2.87% return and COBYX slightly higher at 3.01%.


MEGMX

1D
3.18%
1M
-10.03%
YTD
2.87%
6M
5.08%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*

COBYX

1D
1.85%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
3.01%
6M
7.66%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
3.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MEGMX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGMX
MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEGMXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

0.62

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

0.92

+1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

1.05

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.65

3.15

+3.51

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and COBYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEGMXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

0.62

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.56

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.35

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and COBYX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than COBYX's 1.14% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.89%2.97%0.92%1.82%1.81%7.76%2.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.14%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and COBYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGMXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-34.18%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-8.95%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.03%

-17.10%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.64%

-6.21%

-6.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-6.86%

-8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.99%

+0.87%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 5.20%. This indicates that MEGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MEGMXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

5.20%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

8.42%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

14.59%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

13.98%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

13.55%

+3.72%