PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COBYX vs. PEMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COBYX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than PEMYX's 31.16% return. Over the past 10 years, COBYX has underperformed PEMYX with an annualized return of 4.64%, while PEMYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


COBYX

1D
-1.13%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.19%
1Y
14.99%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
4.64%

PEMYX

1D
3.47%
1M
8.36%
YTD
31.16%
6M
33.14%
1Y
57.40%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
9.37%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%
PEMYX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
31.16%33.48%16.22%12.16%-27.42%-3.85%37.11%22.70%-17.39%42.73%

Correlation

The correlation between COBYX and PEMYX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.48

The correlation between COBYX and PEMYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COBYX vs. PEMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PEMYX
PEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COBYXPEMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.54

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.33

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

16.62

-10.99

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the PEMYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COBYX and PEMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COBYX drawdown since its inception was -34.18%, smaller than the maximum PEMYX drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COBYX and PEMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COBYXPEMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.18%

-45.25%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-13.26%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-13.26%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

-41.05%

+23.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

-45.16%

+10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

0.00%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-16.34%

+9.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.45%

-0.66%

Volatility

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) is 3.04%, while Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that COBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COBYXPEMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

11.12%

-8.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

18.24%

-8.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

20.37%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

17.71%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

18.14%

-4.49%

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COBYX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PEMYX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Dividend Comparison

COBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than PEMYX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.08%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%
PEMYX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.59%0.78%1.85%0.99%0.00%5.27%1.78%1.40%2.16%0.24%1.18%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


COBYX and PEMYX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEMYX has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to COBYX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COBYX dropped -34.18% vs PEMYX's -45.25%.

PEMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COBYX and PEMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer