COBYX vs. PEMYX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

COBYX (The Cook & Bynum Fund) and PEMYX (Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, COBYX returned 4.78%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for PEMYX. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. COBYX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for PEMYX.

Performance

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COBYX achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than PEMYX's 17.49% return. Over the past 10 years, COBYX has underperformed PEMYX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while PEMYX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.

COBYX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: 8.19%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 1Y: 20.62%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 4.78%
• ALL TIME*: 4.78%

PEMYX

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: -4.07%
• 6M: 7.99%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 1Y: 35.35%
• 3Y*: 22.08%
• 5Y*: 7.50%
• 10Y*: 10.55%
• ALL TIME*: 7.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PEMYX Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund	11.82%	20.50%	-10.32%	16.73%	9.28%	9.05%	-10.97%	9.40%	-13.40%	15.12%
PEMYX Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund	17.49%	33.48%	16.22%	12.16%	-27.42%	-3.85%	37.11%	22.70%	-17.39%	42.73%

Correlation

The correlation between COBYX and PEMYX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between COBYX and PEMYX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

COBYX vs. PEMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COBYX

COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 66
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PEMYX

PEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 60
PEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COBYX	PEMYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.44	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.92	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	2.32	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	7.71	-0.38

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PEMYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COBYX and PEMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COBYX drawdown since its inception was -34.18%, smaller than the maximum PEMYX drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COBYX and PEMYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COBYX	PEMYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.18%	-45.25%	+11.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-14.46%	+5.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-14.46%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.10%	-40.49%	+23.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.18%	-45.16%	+10.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-11.18%	+11.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.74%	-16.29%	+9.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	4.34%	-1.66%

Volatility

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) is 3.16%, while Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that COBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COBYX	PEMYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	10.09%	-6.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.77%	21.44%	-11.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	23.28%	-11.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	18.27%	-4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.67%	18.41%	-4.74%

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COBYX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PEMYX's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

COBYX vs. PEMYX - Dividend Comparison

COBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than PEMYX's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund	1.05%	1.18%	0.00%	1.01%	1.16%	2.18%	0.32%	0.69%	12.60%	1.88%	5.09%	0.00%
PEMYX Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund	0.66%	0.78%	1.85%	0.99%	0.00%	5.27%	1.78%	1.40%	2.16%	0.24%	1.18%	1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COBYX and PEMYX in my portfolio?

COBYX and PEMYX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COBYX or PEMYX?

PEMYX has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to COBYX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COBYX dropped -34.18% vs PEMYX's -45.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.