COBYX vs. DAADX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

COBYX (The Cook & Bynum Fund) and DAADX (DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, COBYX returned 6.69%/yr vs 26.41%/yr for DAADX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COBYX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DAADX.

Performance

COBYX vs. DAADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COBYX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than DAADX's 40.41% return.

COBYX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 9.19%
• 1Y: 14.99%
• 3Y*: 6.69%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 4.64%

DAADX

• 1D: 3.39%
• 1M: 8.84%
• YTD: 40.41%
• 6M: 43.30%
• 1Y: 65.20%
• 3Y*: 26.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COBYX vs. DAADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund	9.37%	20.50%	-10.32%	16.73%	9.28%	-0.08%
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	40.41%	27.59%	3.44%	24.58%	-15.81%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between COBYX and DAADX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021	0.47

The correlation between COBYX and DAADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COBYX vs. DAADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COBYX

COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 25
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

DAADX

DAADX Risk / Return Rank: 93
DAADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DAADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DAADX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DAADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DAADX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COBYX vs. DAADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COBYX	DAADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	3.27	-1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	3.95	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.64	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	4.96	-3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	18.83	-13.20

COBYX vs. DAADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the DAADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COBYX and DAADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COBYX vs. DAADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COBYX drawdown since its inception was -34.18%, which is greater than DAADX's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COBYX and DAADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COBYX	DAADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.18%	-24.98%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-13.14%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-18.78%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	0.00%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-6.71%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	3.44%	-0.65%

Volatility

COBYX vs. DAADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) is 3.04%, while DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that COBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COBYX	DAADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	10.89%	-7.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	18.26%	-8.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	19.90%	-8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.99%	15.19%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.65%	15.19%	-1.54%

COBYX vs. DAADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COBYX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DAADX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

COBYX vs. DAADX - Dividend Comparison

COBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DAADX's 1.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund	1.08%	1.18%	0.00%	1.01%	1.16%	2.18%	0.32%	0.69%	12.60%	1.88%	5.09%
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	1.78%	2.28%	2.64%	2.82%	3.02%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COBYX and DAADX in my portfolio?

COBYX and DAADX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COBYX or DAADX?

DAADX has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to COBYX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COBYX dropped -34.18% vs DAADX's -24.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.