PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDI vs. XLVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEDI vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDI achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than XLVI's -0.67% return.


MEDI

1D
1.06%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.83%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
10Y*

XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDI vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MEDI and XLVI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.76

MEDI vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEDI
XLVI

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.6%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

MEDI
100.0%
XLVI

-

Basic Materials

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Communication Services

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Cyclical

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Defensive

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Energy

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Financial Services

MEDI

-

XLVI
100.6%

Industrials

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Real Estate

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Technology

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Utilities

MEDI

-

XLVI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDI vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDI
MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XLVI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDI vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEDIXLVIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

MEDI vs. XLVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEDIXLVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.33

-0.59

Drawdowns

MEDI vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and XLVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDIXLVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.24%

-8.14%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-4.02%

-3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-1.95%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

Volatility

MEDI vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDIXLVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

10.94%

+8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.63%

10.94%

+7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

10.94%

+7.69%

MEDI vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEDI vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison

MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than XLVI's 11.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
0.29%0.28%0.54%1.86%
XLVI
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.53%5.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEDI and XLVI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MEDI.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 0.29% for MEDI.

MEDI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.35% for XLVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDI and XLVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer