MDYV vs. TMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV).
MDYV and TMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. Both MDYV and TMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MDYV vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDYV vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.05% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 3.17% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 3.86% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than TMDV's 3.86% return.
MDYV
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDYV vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDYV vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank
MDYV
TMDV
MDYV vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.33 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 0.59 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.07 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 0.56 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 1.62 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.33 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.26 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.30 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and TMDV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDYV vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than TMDV's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.86% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.64% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and TMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -33.42% | -27.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -10.52% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -17.11% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -7.16% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -5.42% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 3.62% | +0.24% |
Volatility
MDYV vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 3.78%. This indicates that MDYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDYV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.78% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 8.37% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 14.88% | +5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 14.43% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 18.79% | +3.11% |