MDYV vs. FAB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - MDYV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while FAB tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYV returned 10.40%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for FAB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FAB.

Performance

MDYV vs. FAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than FAB's 10.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDYV having a 10.40% annualized return and FAB not far behind at 10.39%.

MDYV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 9.04%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

FAB

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 11.08%
• 1Y: 26.09%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. FAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF	9.04%	7.45%	11.48%	15.35%	-7.19%	30.51%	3.68%	25.89%	-11.95%	12.31%
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	10.72%	9.86%	7.82%	15.81%	-6.79%	30.83%	2.40%	23.73%	-14.62%	14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and FAB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2007	0.86

The correlation between MDYV and FAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDYV vs. FAB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDYV	FAB
Financial Services	21.8%	23.9%
Industrials	18.8%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	13.9%
Real Estate	9.6%	7.7%
Technology	9.3%	7.9%
Energy	7.4%	8.3%
Basic Materials	6.0%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	5.9%
Utilities	4.2%	6.2%
Healthcare	3.5%	7.1%
Communication Services	0.5%	2.7%

Return for Risk

MDYV vs. FAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV

MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 39
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FAB

FAB Risk / Return Rank: 63
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. FAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDYV	FAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.91	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.92	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	3.94	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	12.25	-5.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDYV vs. FAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and FAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDYV	FAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.91	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.42	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.47	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.34	+0.07

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. FAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FAB drawdown of -63.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and FAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDYV	FAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.71%	-63.29%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-6.65%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.58%	-22.91%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-22.91%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	-47.08%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.98%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.62%	-9.25%	+0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.14%	+0.92%

Volatility

MDYV vs. FAB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) at 3.15%. This indicates that MDYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDYV	FAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.15%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	8.64%	+1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	13.81%	+1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.50%	18.72%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	22.06%	-0.16%

MDYV vs. FAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FAB's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDYV vs. FAB - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than FAB's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.59%	1.57%	2.00%	1.94%	1.80%	1.32%	1.59%	1.75%	1.96%	1.42%	1.40%	1.62%
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF	1.73%	1.72%	1.89%	1.59%	1.90%	1.74%	1.69%	1.83%	2.28%	2.48%	1.83%	4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDYV and FAB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, MDYV and FAB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MDYV or FAB?

MDYV has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FAB (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs FAB's -63.29%.

Which ETF is better, MDYV or FAB?

On 10-year performance, MDYV leads with 10.40% vs 10.39% for FAB. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FAB has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDYV or FAB?

Over the 10-year period, MDYV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDYV or FAB?

MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDYV or FAB?

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.59% for FAB.

What is the main difference between MDYV and FAB?

MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.64% for FAB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.